Full Record

Ethics Committee rulings
Record ID:
25367
Format:
LIJ Article
Year:
2006
Source:
LIJ (2006) 80 No 12
Date_of_entry:
22/12/2006
Notes:
Litigation - conflice of interest/professional mobility (R4365 June 2006) - an employee practitioner who subsequently acts as a principal in another firm may not have a conflict of interest in acting for a client associated with a previous client ; Property law - trust account / acting without instructions (R4366 July 2006) - issues subsequently raised by a client outside the scope of an undertaking will not result in deferring compliance with the undertaking ; Wills and estates - legal practice management / release documents (R4363 July 2006) - a firm is not entitled to charge the executor of an estate an administration fee to obtain an original will in its possession
Section:
Ethics Rulings
Month:
December


Item Availability
Item Availability
Similar Items
Similar Items
Author:
Groves, Matthew ;
Year:
2006
Subject:
Family Law ; Wills ; Administration of Estates ; Meier v Bell (Unreported, VIC S.Ct., 3 March 1997) ; Dow v Hoskins [2003] VSC 206 ; Smith v Tamworth City Council [1997] 41 NSWLR 680 at 699 ; Jones v Dodd [1999] 73 SASR 328 ; Robinson v Pinegrove Memorial Park Ltd [1986] 7 BPR 15,097 ; Leeburn v Derndorfer [2004] VSC 172 ; (2004) 14 VR 100 ;