Full Record

Modifying and discharging restrictive covenants in Victoria
Record ID:
24759
Format:
LIJ Article
Year:
2006
Author:
Barton, Philip ;
Source:
LIJ (2006) 80 No 1 & 2
Date_of_entry:
04/04/2006
Legislation:
Victorian Civil and Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1998
Notes:
Property and Environmental Law Section (PELS) special issue. ; Two approaches exist for modifying or discharging restrictive covenants in Victoria: via the Supreme Court under the Property Law Act or less formally by planning permit in VCAT.
Section:
Special Issue
Cases:
Stanhill Pty Ltd v Jackson [2005] VSC 169 ; Bevilacqua v Merakovsky [2005] VSC 235 ;
Month:
January-February


Item Availability
Item Availability
Similar Items
Similar Items
Author:
Kovacs, Dorothy ;
Year:
1990
Subject:
Seidler v. Schallhoffer (1982) F.L.C. 91-273 ; Steadman v. Steadman [1976] AC 536 ; Calverley v. Green (1985) DFC 95-006 ; Bloch v. Bloch 55 A.L.J.R. 701 ; Hohol v. Hohol (1980) F.L.C. 90-824 ; Thwaites v. Ryan [1984] V.R. 65 ; Baumgartner v. Baumgartner (1988) DFC 95-058 ; Muschinski v. Dodds (1985) DFC 95-020 ; Hibberson v. George (1989) DFC 95-064 ; Lipman v. Lipman (1989) DFC 95-068 ; Real Property ; Conveyancing ; De Facto Relationships ; Family Law ; Butler v. Crane (1986) DFC 95-038 ; Waltons Stores (Interstate) Ltd. v. Maher (1988) 164 C.L.R. 387 ;
Author:
Libbis, Simon ;
Year:
2017
Subject:
Real Property ; Restrictive Covenants ; Easements ; Adverse Possession ; Boundaries and Fences ; Wong v McConville & Ors (No. 2) [2014] VSC 282 ;
LIV Social
Footer