Full Record

The ethics of allowing video filming of trials
Record ID:
20515
Format:
LIJ Article
Year:
1999
Author:
Ross, Ysaiah ;
Source:
LIJ (1999) 73 No 4
Date_of_entry:
27/04/1999
Notes:
Explores the possibility of allowing the camera to follow all aspects of an important criminal trial
Section:
Ethics
Month:
April


Item Availability
Item Availability
Similar Items
Similar Items
Author:
Moisidis, Cosmas ;
Year:
2000
Subject:
Defendants ; Criminal Procedure ; Practice & Procedure ; Trials ; Conflict of Interest ; Legal Representation ; Sentencing ; Informants ; Evidence ; Chinese Walls ; R v Clark ; R v Greatbatch ; R v White & White ; Arthur Mills & Ors v The Queen ; R v Bullis ; R v Silvini ; Holloway v Arkansas ; Mallesons Stephen Jaques v KPMG Peat Marwick & Ors ; Unioil v Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu ;
Author:
Fitzsimmons, Tim ;
Year:
2004
Subject:
Practice & Procedure ; Supreme Courts ; Video Recordings ; Evidence ; Witnesses ; R v Kyu Hyuk KIm (198) 104 A Crim R 233 ; Tetra Pak Marketing Pty Ltd v Musashi Pty Ltd [2000} FCA 1261 ;
Author:
McAuliffe, Liam ;
Year:
2024
Subject:
Judgments ; Supreme Courts ; Criminal Law ; Appeals ; Video Recordings ; Evidence ; Movel (a pseudonym) v The King [2024] VSCA 183 ;
Author:
Priest, Phillip ;
Year:
1991
Subject:
Evidence ; Abalos v. Australian Postal Commission (unreported, 15 November 1990, FC90/044) ;
Year:
1991
Subject:
Criminal Law ; Trials ; R. v. John Mark Jones and Frank William Waghorn (unreported, 22 March1991, Supreme Court of Victoria, F.C.) ; R. v. Demirok [1976] V.R. 244 ;