Law Institute Victoria

Full Record

< Back To Results | Email Record
O.J. Simpson revisited
Record ID:
17244
Format:
LIJ Article
Year:
1996
Author:
Fricke, Judge Graham ;
Subject:
Criminal Trials ; Juries ; Jurists ; Evidence ; Defences ; Criminal Procedure ;
Source:
LIJ (1996) 70 No 1
Date_of_entry:
04/04/1996
Legislation:
United States First Amendment
Notes:
Issues raised in the O.J. Simpson trial - Australian and US comparison of jury selection
Section:
Lawlines
People:
O.J. Simpson ;
Cases:
R v Murphy (1989) 167 CLR 94 ;
Month:
January

Request Article

Item Availability
Expand View
Item Availability
Collapse View
Similar Items
Expand View
Similar Items
Collapse View
Expand | Email | Save
An acccused person's right of confrontation versus protection of witnesses
Author:
Boyce, Christopher ;
Year:
2002
Subject:
Criminal Procedure ; Criminal Evidence ; Childrens Evidence ; Juries ; Criminal Trials ; Defendants ; Witnesses ; Coy v Iowa 101 L Ed 2d 857 ; Mayland v Craing 111 L Ed 2d 666 ; Matttox v US 39 L Ed 409 ;
Identification warnings (R of J)
Author:
Priest, Phillip ;
Year:
1992
Subject:
Evidence ; Juries ; Domican v. R (unreported, 6 May 1992, FC 92/011) ;
Consciousness of guilt. The use of lies told by the accused
Author:
Lyon, Gregory ; Walmsley, Bruce ;
Year:
1997
Subject:
Evidence ; Criminal Trials ; Edwards v R (1993) 178 CLR 193 ; R v Ziyad Laz Unreported 20/1296 Court of Appeal (Vic) ; R v Renzella [1997] 2VR 88 ;
Withdrawing cases from juries after Naxakis v Western General Hospital
Author:
Skene, Professor Loane ;
Year:
2000
Subject:
Evidence ; Medical Evidence ; Juries ; Torts ; Negligence ; Naxakis v Western General Hospital (1999) 197 CLR 269 ; Rogers v Whitaker ; Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee ; Sidaway v Governors of Bethlem Royal Hospital ; Lowns v Woods ; Chappel v Hart ;
Conflicts of interest
Author:
Moisidis, Cosmas ;
Year:
2000
Subject:
Defendants ; Criminal Procedure ; Practice & Procedure ; Trials ; Conflict of Interest ; Legal Representation ; Sentencing ; Informants ; Evidence ; Chinese Walls ; R v Clark ; R v Greatbatch ; R v White & White ; Arthur Mills & Ors v The Queen ; R v Bullis ; R v Silvini ; Holloway v Arkansas ; Mallesons Stephen Jaques v KPMG Peat Marwick & Ors ; Unioil v Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu ;
Provoking debate on murder
Author:
Victoria. Law Reform Commission ;
Year:
2005
Subject:
Law Reform ; Homicide ; Provocation ; Self Defence ; Domestic Violence ; Defences ; Evidence ;
Clear directions
Author:
Victoria. Law Reform Commission ;
Year:
2008
Subject:
Law Reform ; Juries ; Criminal Trials ;
Withdrawing cases from juries after Naxakis v Western General Hospital
Author:
Skene, Professor Loane ;
Year:
2000
Subject:
Evidence ; Medical Evidence ; Juries ; Torts ; Negligence ; Naxakis v Western General Hospital (1999) 197 CLR 269 ; Rogers v Whitaker ; Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee ; Sidaway v Governors of Bethlem Royal Hospital ; Lowns v Woods ; Chappel v Hart ;
New processes for criminal trials
Year:
2015
Subject:
Criminal Trials ; Juries ;
The verdict on juries
Author:
Victoria. Law Reform Commission ;
Year:
2014
Subject:
Law Reform ; Juries ; Jurists ;
LIV Social
Footer