Full Record

Revenge porn: is it time for a statutory privacy tort?
Record ID:
65156
Format:
LIJ Article
Year:
2016
Source:
LIJ (2016) 90 No 11
Date_of_entry:
28/10/2016
Notes:
Revenge porn is the malicious disclosure of sexually explicit material without the consent of the victim. This article discusses whether a federal tort for an interference in privacy be established.
Section:
Feature
Month:
November


Item Availability
Item Availability
Similar Items
Similar Items
Year:
1994
Subject:
Financial Institutions ; Banks ; Privacy ; Confidential Information ; Tournier v. National Provincial and Union Bank of England [1924] 1 K.B.461 ;
Year:
1994
Subject:
Confidential Information ; Privacy ; Arbitration ; Esso Australia Resources Ltd. & Ors v. The Honourable Sidney Plowman (TheMinister for Energy and Minerals) & Ors [1994] 1 V.R. 1 ; Oxford Shipping Co. Pty. Ltd. v. Nipon Yusen Kaisha (The Eastern Saga) [1984]3 All E.R. 835 ; B.P. Refinery (Westernport) Pty. Ltd. v President, Councillors and Ratepayersof Shire of Hastings (1977) 52 A.L.J.R. 20 ; Alliance Petroleum Australia N.L. v. Australian Gas Light Co (1983) 34S.A.S.R. 215 ; Hassneh Insurance Co. Of Israel & Ors v. Steuart J. Mew [1993] 2 Lloyds LawReports 243 ;
Author:
Branagan ;
Year:
2002
Subject:
Electronic Mail ; Privacy ; Internet ; Pornography ; Workplace Regulation ; Vicarious Liability ; Smith v Western Hospital AIRC Print Q1359 2 June 1998 ; Toyota v AMWU AIRC Print T4675 18 December 2000 ; Ansett v ASU [2000] FCA 441 ;
LIV Social
Footer