Full Record

ATO knocked back
Record ID:
26207
Format:
LIJ Article
Year:
2008
Source:
LIJ (2008) 82 No 5
Date_of_entry:
16/05/2008
Notes:
The ATO is challenging the Full Federal Court's ruling that GST is not payable on forfeited deposits. If its appeal to the High Court is unsuccessful, some suppliers may be entitled to refunds
Section:
Feature
Month:
May


Item Availability
Item Availability
Similar Items
Similar Items
Year:
2006
Subject:
Goods & Services Tax ; Crime Prevention ; Merringtons Pty Limited v Luxottica Retail Australia Pty Ltd & Anor, SCVNo. 9435 of 2005 (Master Wood, 16 June 2006) ; Macken, Dominic ; Taylor, Dave ;
Author:
Stacey, Paul ;
Year:
2007
Subject:
Goods & Services Tax ; Taxation ; Costs ; Keen v Telstra Corporation Limited [2006] FCA 69 (27 June 2006) ; Merringtons Pty Ltd v Luxottica Retail Australia Pty Ltd & Anor. SupremeCourt of Victoria, No 9435 of 2005 (16 June 2006) ; Thornton v Apollo Nominees Pty Ltd [2005] TASSC 38 (19 May 2005) ;
Author:
Bean, Gerry ;
Year:
2007
Subject:
Taxation ; Goods & Services Tax ; Customs and Excise Commissioner v Redrow Group PLC [1999] STC 161 ;
Year:
2017
Subject:
Goods & Services Tax ; Risk Management ; A & A Property Developers Pty Ltd v MCCA Asset Management Ltd [2016] VSC 653 ; Ashton v Monteleone [2010] NSWSC 258 ; Cityrose Trading Pty Ltd v Booth & Anor [2013] VSC 504 ;
LIV Social
Footer