Full Record

Accrued jurisdiction in the Family Court of Australia
Record ID:
22940
Format:
LIJ Article
Year:
2002
Author:
Molyneux, Clarinda ; Skinner, Rowan ;
Source:
LIJ (2002) 76 No 11
Date_of_entry:
26/11/2002
Notes:
This article discusses the Family Court decision in Warby which gave parties to matrimonial causes and third parties the ability to attach non-federal claims, but there are restrictions to this accrued jurisdiction
Section:
Feature
Cases:
Warby v Warby (2002) FLC 93-091 ;
Month:
December


Item Availability
Item Availability
Similar Items
Similar Items
Author:
Di Lallo, Tomaso ; Moore, Russell ;
Year:
1995
Subject:
Corporations Law ; Jurisdiction ; Practice & Procedure ; Re Satellite Productions Pty Ltd (1992) 39 FCR 62 ; Churcher v Edwardstown Carpets (Reg) (1993) 60 SASR 503 ; Vale v TMH Haulage Pty Ltd (1993) 31 NSWLR 702 ; Putnin as liquidator of Timeworth Pty Ltd v Jenka Pty Ltd (1994) 13 ACSR 68 ; Australian Securities Commission v Marlborough Goldmines Ltd (1993) 177 CLR485 ;
Author:
Reinhardt, Greg ;
Year:
2003
Subject:
Supreme Courts ; Judgments ; Defamation ; Practice & Procedure ; Jurisdiction ; Conflict of Laws ; Gutnick v Dow Jones [2001] VSC 305 ; Dow Jones & Company Inc v Gutnick [2002] HCA 56 10 December 2002 ; Gutnick v Dow Jones & Co. Inc [2003] VSC 79 21 March 2003 ;
Author:
Weerasooria, W.S. ;
Year:
1991
Subject:
Barristers ; Jurisdiction ; Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (N.S.W.) v. Chamberlain [1990] 93 A.L.R.729 ; Bourke v. State Bank of New South Wales [1988] 85 A.L.R. 61 ; Street v. Queensland Bar Association [1989] 88 A.L.R. 321 ;