Full Record

Conflicts of interest and confidential information
Record ID:
19420
Format:
LIJ Article
Year:
1997
Author:
Paterson, Jeannie ;
Source:
LIJ (1997) 71 No 11
Date_of_entry:
11/11/1997
Notes:
The issue of whether or not a legal firm is in a conflict of interest situation because of information possessed by one of its partners was examined in Unioil INternational Pty Ltd and Ors v Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu (A Firm) and Ors. ; Breach of fiduciary duties - conflict of interest - failure to disclose - spread of knowledge within and between firms - the duty to disclose
Section:
Articles
Cases:
Unioil International Pty Ltd and Ors v Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu (A Firm)and Ors (Unreported, 18 July 1997, Suprme Court of WA, Ipp J.) ;
Month:
November


Item Availability
Item Availability
Similar Items
Similar Items
Author:
Hurley, Thomas ;
Year:
1993
Subject:
Fiduciary Relationships ; Conflict of Interest ; Carindale Country Club Estate P/L v. Astill & Ors (unreported, 10 May1993, QG 33/93, Drummond J.) ; Rakusen v. Ellis, Munday & Clarke [1912] 1 Ch. 831 ;
Author:
Hurley, Thomas ;
Year:
1992
Subject:
Conflict of Interest ; Wendy Wan v. McDonald (unreported, 3 January 1992, QG 3/90, Burchett J.) ;
Author:
Hurley, Thomas ;
Year:
1992
Subject:
Conflict of Interest ; Trade Practices ; Mahoe Developments P/L v. Lionbond P/L (unreported, 31 December 1991, QG102/89, Spender J.) ;
Author:
Gronow, Michael ;
Year:
1993
Subject:
Conflict of Interest ; Rakusen v. Ellis Munday & Clarke [1912] 1 Ch 831 ; Mallesons Stephen Jaques v. KPMG Peat Marwick & Ors (1991) 4 W.A.R. 357 ; Re a Firm of Solicitors [1992] 2 W.L.R. 809 ; Murray v. Macquarie Bank (1992) 105 A.L.R. 612 ; Australian Commercial Research and Development Ltd. v. Hampson [1991] 1 Qd.R.508 ;
LIV Social
Footer